Showing posts with label QE and Colloquium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label QE and Colloquium. Show all posts

Sunday, August 8, 2010

OUM 3rd PhD Colloquium

Dato' Ahmad delivering his keynote address

Part of the participants of the colloquium

The 3rd PhD OUM Colloquium was held at OUM Main Campus on 7th - 8th August, 2010. YBhg Dato' Ir. (Hj) Ahmad Zaidee Laidin, Academy of Science Malaysia has been kind enough to deliver his very enlightening keynote address entitled: "Innovation and Excellence in Research", to a group of over 60 PhD students of OUM who have come from as far as Sarawak and Singapore.



Tan Sri Dr. Anuwar Ali presenting a token of appreciation to Dato' Ahmad witnessed by Prof. Dr. Mohd Ghazali

One for the album



Earlier, Emeritus Professor Tan Sri Anuwar Ali, President/Vice Chancellor of OUM delivered has welcoming address. Also present were Prof. Dr. Mansor Fadzil, Senior VP of OUM, Prof. Dr. Rosli, VP of OUM, Prof. Ramli Bahroom, Financial Controller of OUM and Prof. Mohd Ghazali, Dean of the Centre for Graduate Studies.

Dr. Nagarajah facilitating the session on research instrument development.

Part of the participants during the workshop assisted by Prof. Dr. Zuraidah (black jacket)

Part of the participants during tea break

During the 2-day colloquium, participants were exposed to matters related to the development of research instruments and the various statistics to test the models by Associate Prof. Dr. Nagarajah Lee and Associate Prof. Dr. Chung. A hands-on workshop were also conducted on how to use AMOS.

Seng Poh presenting her mock viva


Siow Ming presenting her mock viva

At the end of the colloquium, 2 PhD students who are waiting for their viva, Siow Ming and Seng Poh, were invited to present their Mock Viva.

Patrick Wong (left) and Richard Ng (right) were the other 2 PhD candidates waiting for their viva

Generally the participants were very satisfied with the colloquium. A big syabas to Prof. Ghazali, Dean of the Centre for Graduate Studies of OUM and his team for organizing this colloquium.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

3rd OUM PhD Colloquium - Aug 7 & 8, 2010

Calling all Post Graduate Learners of OUM. The Center for Graduate Studies of Open University Malaysia will be organizing the colloquium for all post graduate students on August 7 & 8, 2010.

Tentative Schedule:

Please click on the picture to enlarge it

Colloquium Format:

1. Key-note address:

Title: Innovation and Excellence in Research
Speaker: Datuk Ir (Dr) Hj. Ahmad Zaidee Laidin, Academy of Science Malaysia

2. Seminar & Workshop:

Instrumentation in Questionnaire Survey
AP. Dr. Nagarajah Lee (OUM),AP. Dr. Saodah Wok (UIA), Dr Sathiamoorthy Kannan (UM) & Dr. Soon Seng Thah (EPRD)

3. Student Presentation

4 – 6 PhD students awaiting their VIVA will share their research with their peers.

Guidelines for paper presentation by students
a. Mode of presentation: Powerpoint
b. Aspects to be covered:

1. Objectives of the study
2. Research questions and/or hypotheses
3. Significance of the study
4. Methodology
* Research method/Design
* Population & sample/Participants
* Data collection procedures
* Framework of analysis
* Results & Findings

c. Time frame: 45 minutes

* Oral Presentation (30 minutes)
* Question & Answer and Panel Feedback (15 minutes)

REGISTRATION

RM150 per participant
* Registration fees include morning and afternoon tea break, lunches and colloquium materials.

All cash payments can only be made at the OUM Main Campus, Jalan Tun Ismail. All cheques, money orders and postal orders, made payable to UNITEM, should be sent to:

Secretariat,
3rd PhD Colloquium,
Centre for Graduate Studies,
Open University Malaysia,
Jalan Tun Ismail,
50480 Kuala Lumpur
(Att. Cik Marlina bt Mahadzir)

To ensure that your participation at the colloquium is confirmed, please make your payment ON or BEFORE 20 July 2010.

Online Registration: Click here

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Acing your Qualifying Exam: Strategies for Success in any Department

Graduate students in a myriad of departments at UC Davis: engineering, physical sciences, agricultural and biological sciences, as well as the arts, humanities and social sciences are united by the common thread of the dreaded qualifying exam. For many graduate students this is one of the most uncertain, stressful, and time consuming aspects of their graduate education. This exam, may be written or oral or both, or follow any format according to the specific requirement of the graduate program.

Although the content and structure of qualifying examinations varies widely by discipline, this information focuses on universal "strategies for success" that will be valuable to graduate students in all departments. This information will help to demystify the qualifying exam, and empower graduate students with the skills and strategies to feel confident and prepared when the time comes for their exam. In addition, this information is a resource for graduate student advisors to better achieve their mentoring goals.

The following are the “Five Golden Rules” of qualifying exam preparation.

1. Understand the qualifying exam.
2. Know your examiners.
3. Prepare early.
4. Reduce your stress.
5. Have an exam day plan.


Students who follow these “golden rules” in combination with close consultation with their advisor, and committee members will be superbly prepared for success on their qualifying exam.

So, where and when do you start? Ideally you should start with golden rule #1 about 6 months before your qualifying exam. However, graduate students often begin preparation 3 or fewer months in advance and also have good success.

Golden Rule #1: Understand the qualifying exam.

It may sound simplistic, but understanding what the qualifying exam is, how it works, and its format is absolutely imperative to its successful completion. By graduate school, most graduate students are truly “professional students.” That is, they are experts at essay, multiple choice, and short answer tests, quizzes, and assignments. However, few graduate students are well practiced at oral examination. That is one of the reasons why the qualifying exam is so scary.

To abide by golden rule #1 you will need to obtain the following information:

1. How much time does the exam usually take?
2. What is the format of the exam?
3. How is your performance assessed?

The best way to obtain this information is from a variety of sources. First and foremost ask your advisors for their input. Next ask these questions to all of your committee members, especially your chair. Cross check their answers to see if all of your committee members are on the same page when it comes to the time, format, and assessment. If not, then you may want to let your committee chair know so he or she can set the tone for your committee.

Next, you should ask these questions to other graduate students in your department who have recently passed their qualifying exam.

After you have mastered the time, format, and assessment of the qualifying exam you will have a complete understanding of what it is you are about to undertake. Next you are ready for golden rule #2.

Golden Rule #2: Know your examiners.


The members of your qualifying exam committee are the gatekeepers of you advancing to candidacy. If you invited professors to serve on your committee, then be sure that you know them well, and have at least taken one course from them.

As these people will be spending a few hours with you discussing your discipline, and your research during your exam, you should spend some time researching each of your committee member’s scientific backgrounds. This will make you familiar with their expertise, research, teaching, and even a bit of their personality. You should research the following:

1. What is your committee member's academic training? Where did they get their degrees, and in what departments?

2. What are your examiners publications? What topics do they write about? In what journals do they publish papers?

After you have thoroughly researched all of your committee members, and have verified that they are all suitable and applicable for your committee (if you haven't already) you should meet with them.

Try to meet with them in person several times before the exam, as this will let you get to know them better, their style of questions, and their personality. When you meet with them you should ask each of them the following questions:

1. What is their philosophy towards the examination?
2. Does your lab/department have a book of commonly asked oral exam questions?
3. What types of questions do they usually ask?

As a result of your background research and your meetings with committee members, you should be able to obtain a good sense of where each of your committee members is coming from, what they expect from you, and what types of questions they might ask you.

This information is invaluable. It will help to put you at ease with their personalities, and can help you anticipate possible questions they may ask you.

Golden Rule #3: Prepare early and systematically.

So how do you prepare for a qualifying exam? Clearly, what to study varies according to your department and research field, but below are strategies that apply to any department.

Be systematic in your study approach. What does it mean to be “systematic”? It simply means to organize the topics that you will study from general to specific as this is often how your exam questions will progress, and it is the best way to re-learn material.

Begin your systematic studying 6 months in advance. However, do not stress out if all you have to study is 3 or even 2 months. As long as you are systematic in your preparation, you will be in good shape.

1. First, review the basics of your field. You can achieve this by reviewing all of your past lower division courses. You can use your old notes, text books, exams, and lab write ups. Focus on the main themes and concepts. You may think that you have forgotten everything, but it will begin to come back to you and be familiar.

2. Next, review the specifics of your field. This means reviewing all of the material covered in any of upper division or graduate level courses. Again, focus on the major themes and concepts. However, if there are details that relate to your research or your field of study, then focus on those as well.

3. Now, Prepare and practice your dissertation research proposal. Often your dissertation proposal is formulated under guidance from your advisor. This would include a thorough literature review, research objectives and hypotheses, methodology, and expected results. The exam candidate is at an advantage here because at your qualifying exam, you will (or should be) the expert on your research topic. Therefore, any questions that your committee has about your research proposal you will be able to answer.

A great strategy for practicing your dissertation research proposal is to explain your research to others. Begin with those in your department, because they will have general knowledge of your research, and will be able to give you scientifically based critiques. Then, the greatest test of your ability to clearly explain your research is to present it to people outside of your field of study. This could include your friends in other departments, parents, or grandparents. The more that you talk about your research and answer questions about it, the more prepared and confident you will become for your qualifying exam.

4. Next, prepare your “how I came to be here speech.” Again, all departments are different and you should consult with your advisor and committee chair to see if this applies to you, but most qualifying exams begin with some sort of “how I came to be here speech.”

Basically the speech is a warm up for you, and if you prepare for it, you can hit a grand slam! Your committee may ask, “How did you come to be before us today” or “Why did you decide to get your PhD”, or “Why did you chose your topic of study.” The beauty of all of these questions is that there is no wrong answer. The answer is all up to you, and it gives you a chance to tell the committee about yourself, perhaps things they never knew before (where you grew up, childhood experiences, and inspiring events in your life). You also should think of the “how I came to be here” speech as a platform for you to plant seeds for further questions from your committee members. Any information which you give them in this speech may prompt additional questions from them, so be sure to mention things that you would be happy to discuss further.

5. Prepare for anticipated questions. After you have reviewed the general and specific topics in your field, interviewed and met several times with your committee members, and have prepared your research proposal, you will have covered all of the potential topics that are game for your qualifying exam. As such, you should begin to generate anticipated questions.

It is a little bit like predicting the future, but using what you have learned about the format and types of questions asked during exams, you should be able to come up with a few hundred potential questions.

6. Set up a practice qualifying exam. Setting up a practice qualifying exam is an easy way to give you a taste of what to expect on exam day. Enlist the help of your colleagues, fellow graduate students, or even friends or family. Present to them your “how I came to be here speech,” and your research proposal. Have one of them keep time for you, so you can adjust the length of your speech and proposal accordingly come exam day. Have them each ask you several of the “anticipated questions” that you have already formulated and even ones that they come up with themselves. Also ask them fore critiques on your speech, volume, body language…anything that you could work on before your oral exam. Also, try to conduct your mock exam in the same room in which you will have your qualifying exam.

7. Review recent scientific journals. As the date of your qualifying exam approaches, be sure to read the latest editions of the most important research journals in your field and sub-field. Being informed about the latest research and discoveries in your field may be useful when answering your examiners questions. Also, as your committee members often read these same journals and they may draw some of their questions from recent journal articles.

Golden Rule #4: Reduce your stress.

The qualifying examination is clearly one of the most stressful events in a graduate student’s academic experience. This is very common as the exam is often shrouded in mystery, is an unfamiliar test format, and can be “high stakes”.

If you have prepared systematically, you are in great shape and should be confident that you are well prepared to succeed in your qualifying examination. If your stress levels are severe or debilitating you should seek help immediately. However, for minor stress, the following tips can help calm your nerves, and increase your confidence.

1. Schedule your exam at a time and location for your comfort. If you are a morning person then schedule your exam during the morning or in the afternoon if you are an afternoon person. Talk to your committee several months in advance about scheduling a time, and they may be more flexible to accommodate your needs.

2. Decide in advance:

a. How will you respond to off the wall questions? Off the wall questions include those from “left field,” or those that you have not anticipated. Expect that you will get a few of these, and create a plan about how you will respond to them. Perhaps you can ask your committee member to repeat, or clarify the question. Take a few moments to think about it. It is OK if there are a few seconds of silence. Restate the question out loud so that you can make sure you understood the question as it was asked. Then go for it! You are well prepared to answer.

b. How will you respond to questions that you do not know? It is almost inevitable that you will be asked a question or two during your examination that you do not know the answer to. So it is best to prepare ahead how you will answer it when it is asked. Do not try to “fake” your way out of it. It is best to be honest and say that you don’t know. Some possible answers include:

* “I don’t have that information at this time. I would obtain that information from…”

* “That is a good question, and I am not sure about the answer. However, I would find the answer by…”

* “I am not sure what the answer is, but if I was to make a hypothesis based on my knowledge it would be….”

By having a plan for what to do, you will reduce your stress level if and when a questions is asked that you do not know the answer to.

3. The week before.

a. Reconfirm the date and location of the qualifying exam room with all your committee members. This way you can touch base one last time with all of them before the big day. You can rest assured that everyone is clear on the day, time, and place.

b. Visit the exam room and check that the keys fit, the lighting, heating, air-conditioning, are all functional and ready to go. This will help alleviate any of the nagging “what if’s” about your exam day.

Golden Rule #5: Have an exam day plan.

It will help you immensely if you have a plan, and know what to expect on your exam day.

1. The morning of:

a. Dress appropriately. This is usually professional or business dress. Look good…Feel good.

b. Eat a small meal. Even if you are nervous, try to eat a small meal. Your exam may be upwards of 3 hours, so you really need to fuel your brain and body.

c. Drive or have someone drive you to your exam. Try to avoid biking or public transportation if you can.

d. Get to the exam room early, at least 30 minutes before your exam is scheduled to begin. Open the door, turn on the lights, heat or AC, and set up any audio visual equipment that you may need. After that do not wait in the room, go for a walk and watch your time. Be back to your exam site at 5 minutes before your exam.

2. During your exam:

a. Understand the time constraints of the exam. Use your watch to keep abreast of time and pace your self accordingly. Speak slowly, and clearly. Do not cut off any of your examiners when they are speaking (as they are using up time that could be filled with more questions for you).

b. At the break, leave the exam room and go for a brief walk, or stretch outside, in another hallway, or in the restroom. You are half way there!

c. At the end of the examination, be sure to thank all of your examiners politely for their time, consideration, and efforts.

After your exam try to take some time to celebrate with family and friends. It is a big accomplishment, and you should reward yourself for your efforts.

In conclusion, while the qualifying exam is an often a stressful experience for graduate students, there are universal strategies that can be employed, regardless of the field of study. It is my hope that the “Five Golden Rules” of qualifying exam preparation will help all graduate students, regardless of their department or program, to succeed on their qualifying exam.

Written by Rhea Presiado, UC Davis Professors for the Future, using exam preparation material from Dr. Louis Grivetti, UC Davis, Department of Nutrition. Please contact Rhea Presiado at rsmuchow@ucdavis.edu or Dr. Grivetti at legrivetti@ucdavis.edu for additional information.


Source: http://gradstudies.ucdavis.edu/students/qualifying_exam.html

Monday, July 20, 2009

2nd PhD Colloquium Centre for Graduate Studies, Open University Malaysia 18 – 19 July 2009 - Part 2

The second QE started at 11.45am. The presenter was a PhD student Jeffrey Tan from Singapore and his research topic is: "Effects of Online Social Networking on Personal Effectiveness in Private Institutions of Higher Learning in Singapore".

The 2 external examiners were having discussion with Prof. Ghazali prior to the start of the proposal defense

Part of the participants who attended the QE session

Proposal defense presentation by Jeffrey Tan

The examiner was very generous in giving him 45 minutes to present his proposal. Overall his presentation was quite good and that he was well prepared for proposal defense.

There were 2 external examiners during the QE chaired by Prof. Ghazali, the program coordinator of OUM for PhD(BA). About 30 students turned up for he QE to pick up a point or two for their future QE.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

2nd PhD Colloquium Centre for Graduate Studies, Open University Malaysia 18 – 19 July 2009 - Part 1

July 19, 2009 by Richard Ng

Some 100 PhD students attended the 2-day colloquium held at OUM Main Campus from 18 to 19 July 2009. A few experienced Professors have been invited to give special talk on Data Analysis, Data Collection, Thesis preparation and software tools that can assist them in their studies.

A few students were also presenting their thesis proposal defense to see if they are qualified to proceed to the next level of their studies. I happened to be there today and attended 2 QEs - one by a Masters degree student Ng Man Sang and the other one by a PhD student from Singapore Jeffrey Tan.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Ph. D. Qualifying Exams: Making it to the Other Side

By Melissa Sanchez, Ph.D Student
English & Comparative Literature

For many students who have not yet taken their Ph.D. qualifying exams, the very idea evokes terrifying images of being trapped in a small room, surrounded by experts in your field who are grilling you on extraordinarily difficult questions and waiting for you to trip yourself up. The idea of writing a dissertation may be stressful and intimidating, but the qualifying exam somehow creates a more immediate and clear-cut sense of terror.

If you feel this way about taking your exams, you are not alone. The qualifying exam is undeniably rigorous, and you will need to do a lot of hard work in order to pass this milestone successfully. It may help to remember, however, that the majority of students do pass and that there are steps you can take to increase your chances of doing the same.

• Put the exam in perspective. While the Ph.D. exam certainly requires that you know a great deal about your field, it is also intended to test your ability to communicate this knowledge. “You’ve got to convince people that you really know what you’re talking about,” says former Berkeley Associate Graduate Dean Daniel Melia. “It’s not just a question of what you know, it’s a question of being able to impart what you know. . . this is something that you are going to have to do in your real life as a Ph.D.” In other words, while it is important to have a solid understanding of your field, try not to stress about all of the things that you don’t know. Instead, concentrate on presenting what you do know intelligently and confidently.

Talking to students who have already passed their exams is another way of putting the process into perspective. Not only can they give practical advice on organization and studying, but hearing about their experiences can be reassuring. The more that you talk to people who have already passed, the more confident you will feel about your ability to successfully navigate your own exams.

Finally, try to recognize that your committee wants you to pass. Most likely, your committee will be made up of professors that have contributed to your training over the years, so in a sense your success is a reflection on them. Also, because “you will represent their department when you leave the University,” your success is a reflection on the department as well. This doesn’t mean that you will pass if you are unprepared or incapable of answering the questions, but it does mean that your committee will do whatever they can to help you get through the exam successfully. As one student observed, “It was not a grill atmosphere . . . It was an attempt to give me every opportunity to show what I know.”

• Find out what is expected of you. You can do away with much of the stress of facing the qualifying exam if you demystify it as much as possible. Talk to your advisor and your committee members. Ask them what they expect you to be able to do when you take the exam. The more you know about what to expect from the actual exam, the better you can contain your studying so that you focus on things that will really matter. Find out as many specifics as possible: how long will the questions be? is it more important that you exhibit depth or breadth of knowledge? do you get any breaks? what materials are you allowed to bring to the exam? how can you best organize your time as you prepare? what are the most important things you should be reading?

Another excellent source of information about the exams is students who have already passed, particularly those with whom you have committee members in common. Try to find out which professors like to ask tricky questions, how previous examinees structured their answers, what they wish they had known beforehand. Again, the more information you have, the more confident you’ll be about your own preparation.

Even something as simple as familiarizing yourself with the physical surroundings in which you will take your exam can be helpful. Prior to the actual date of the exam, visit the room in which it will be held. Plan how you will arrange your materials and where you will sit. Visualize yourself entering that room prepared to communicate all of the knowledge you have accrued from the studying you’ve been doing.

• Learn the material. It may seem self-evident to say that you need to know the material in order to pass the exam, but students have been known to enter the examination room still unsure about key concepts in their field. Moreover, “the best defense against nervousness is to really know the material.” If you are unsure about an area that your committee has advised you to study, do not just ignore it and hope it doesn’t come up during the exam. Instead, spend some time working through the problem until you feel that you can talk about it with some degree of confidence. “The things I had problems with on the exam were the things I’d had problems with before conceptually and never followed up on,” said one student. You can’t be expected to know everything about your field, but do make sure that you are well-versed on its key issues, concepts, and methodologies.

• Practice Answering the Questions. Remember, knowing your facts is only half the battle; you also have to be able to demonstrate that you can communicate knowledge clearly and effectively. Depending on your department, you may be asked to take a written exam, an oral exam, or both. Whatever the format of your qualifying exam, you’ll feel a lot less nervous if you’ve practiced the skills that you’ll need to pass.

One way of practicing for the exam is to develop a list of questions and go over it with your advisor. S/he will be able to tell you if you have missed potentially important questions. Once you have a fairly solid ideal of what you will be asked, practice answering. If your exams will be written, write the answers as you would during the actual exam. This will give you an idea of how long it will take you to write each response and how to shape your answer so that it answers the question with the most relevant information.

If your exam will be oral, practice stating your answers aloud. Many students have never taken an oral examination and are unsure how to prepare for it. You might start by speaking into a tape recorder and then playing it back to evaluate the confidence and accuracy of your response. Or, you might get together with a group of fellow students, stage a mock exam, and then have them critique your performance. Remember to also practice how you will handle mistakes: “Rehearse saying that you don’t know. And plan what you will say in case you draw a blank. . . . Gain time by saying, ‘Let me take some time to consider that question.’ Your committee will understand and wait for you to recover.” Recognizing beforehand that your exam won’t go perfectly and preparing to handle those moments will help your performance much more than telling yourself that you have to be perfect.

• Approach the exam with a positive attitude. Look at the exam as an opportunity to demonstrate what you know. View your committee as a group of peers with whom you can discuss the work you’ve done. While it is true that your committee “is judging your ability to reason, synthesize, and communicate,” it is also true that “in many ways you are a peer in knowledge, particularly in your specialty areas.” Seize this opportunity to discuss your own work with a group of experts who are interested in and engaged with what you have to say.

Also, remember that you do have some degree of control over the exam. Take the amount of time you need to answer questions. Pause and think things through, rather than giving a rushed and disorganized response because you don’t want to hold things up. If you aren’t sure how to answer a question, repeat it in your own words or ask the committee member to repeat or rephrase it. If you wish to improve upon or add to a response you gave earlier, find a way to connect it with another question. Finally, if you honestly don’t know the answer, say so. Remember that “the examiners are trying to push the limits of what you know, so expect that they will find gaps. It’s not like a normal course exam where you are expected to know everything. If you don’t know, say so instead of blathering nonsense and irritating the examiners.” If you try to fake your way through an answer it will show, and admitting to not knowing everything will look much better than giving an evasive or contradictory answer.

Frightening as they seem, qualifying exams do not have to be (too much of a) torturous experience. As a graduate student, you are on your way to becoming a scholar and an expert in your field. Try to look at the qualifying exam as one more opportunity to expand your knowledge and expertise. Certainly, it’s a big milestone to pass, but do your best to get as much out of the experience as you can before you pass to the other side.

Notes

1“Studying for the Qualifying Exam,” The Graduate 2:3, University of California, Berkeley: The Graduate Division, 1986.
2 “The Qualifying Exam: Clearing the Hurdle,” The Graduate 2:3, University of California Berkeley: The Graduate Division, 1986.
3 Ibid.
4 Peters, Robert L., Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student’s Guide to Earning a Master’s or a Ph.D. (New York: Noonday, 1992): 158.
5 “Qualifying Exams: Clearing the Hurdle.”
6 Ibid.
7 Ibid.
8 Peters, 159.

Source: GradVoice Online - http://www.ags.uci.edu/~gvoice/99winter/qualify.html

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Preparation for Qualifying Exam (QE)

Posted by Shimatul

Dear PhD(BA) Learners,

We would like to inform those of you who have been successfully completed the courses BPRM7103 Research Methodology in Business Administration and BPMG7103 / BPMK7103 / BPFN7103 Doctoral Seminar with a minimum grade of B (or Satisfactory) to start working on your proposal and prepare to take your QE.

To assist you to accomplish that, a supervisor will be appointed by the CGS. You are required to choose your own supervisor. If you are not able to choose your own supervisor, please get the assistance of your advisor or you can also contact Programme Coordinator of the PhD(BA) programme.

Please bear in mind that the supervisor must be qualified (with PhD) and be approved by the CGS. Please fill in the Nomination of Supervisor form and submit to us for endorsement.

Thank you.